

How useful would it to be to have a version of iTunes that was compatible with tech previews but fails on GA? As has been pointed out several times, iTunes is not supported on Windows 10 and complaining about this is about as relevant as whining that you can't install it on an Apple II or an IBM mainframe. How can Apple (or anyone else) validate or demonstrate "Win 10 compatibility" when the operating system is not released and, even based on the latest technical preview, not finished yet! Win 10 may share some of the kernel code with 8.1 but evidence from previous transitions suggests that many of the services used by applications, including drivers, aren't part of the kernel. So, I expect Win 10 compatibility should be finalized by Apple somewhere around 2018. Think about it.the iPhone 6 is nothing more than a Samsung Galaxy Note 2 that was released in 2012. Those buying the "new" iphones, etc are going to wise up eventually.

I don't like bandwagon riders that do it just for the sake of trying to make themselves appear to know what they're talking about when their own statements prove otherwise. I'm just trying to educate people making claims when they shouldn't because they have no clue what they're talking about. It's just that, as usual, Apple is once again behind the times. I was educating the commenter that they did not know the difference between a Tech Preview and a Beta as well as the fact that the issue is NOT with the Operating System but rather with iTunes considering that Windows 10 is built on the same kernel as Windows 8 & 8.1.Ĭonsidering Apple is having tens of thousands of people with issues with iTunes 12 on the so-called "supported" browsers, it's blatantly obvious the issue is with the application and not the OS.Īnd btw.there are MANY software vendors that have been ensuring their applications are already compatible with Windows 10 prior to the final build being released.
